Consequences of a faulty Franchise Disclosure Document

Article Content

By Ben Hanuka  

The franchise dream v. the legal reality 

Franchising is often presented as a path to rapid business growth without the capital intensity of opening corporate locations. On paper, the model looks promising – less overhead, more reach. But beneath the surface, the risks are significant, and the pitfalls are many. 

For franchisors, and for the lawyers and professional advisors who support them, the greatest threat may not be a weak business concept or slow start. Often, it is a legal one: a non-compliant Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD). This single issue can trigger a chain of failures that no amount of business ambition can overcome. 

The franchise business model is harder to scale than it appears 

For all its appeal, franchising is a difficult model to scale. While it can offer rapid market access, most new franchisors encounter serious roadblocks early in the process. 

Industry research and long-term studies consistently show that: 

• Many franchisors never sell more than a handful of units, even after several years 
• Only a small minority reach meaningful scale — such as 100 operating locations 
• A large portion of new franchise systems disappear within a decade, unable to gain traction or maintain operations 

These patterns are well known among franchise lawyers and advisors. They reflect recurring and predictable systemic problems that can be avoided with the right planning and legal oversight. 

When the franchise concept lacks scalability 

Many franchisors assume that success in a single location will translate seamlessly across multiple markets. But scaling a franchise system requires far more than replicating a storefront – it demands an entirely different level of operational and leadership capability. 

Often, the underlying concept is not built for growth. It may lack distinctiveness in a crowded market, suffer from inconsistent branding, or fail to resonate beyond its original geography. These issues, while important, are symptoms of the broader problem: the business was not structured to scale from the outset. 

Without the systems, leadership, and adaptability required for multi-unit expansion, the franchisor quickly stalls, unable to move beyond a few struggling locations. 

The long-term cost of poor franchisee selection 

Franchisees are not simply buying into a business model. Rather, they are entrusted with carrying the brand forward. But too often, franchisors focus on a candidate’s financial capacity while overlooking alignment with the business’s operational demands. A franchisee may have the funds to invest, but lack the discipline, judgment, or leadership mindset to run the business effectively. 

In many cases, the selection process is rushed. Screening can be superficial, missing clear signs of inexperience or poor fit. And in some systems, approvals are driven more by the franchisor’s short-term need for cash flow than by long-term strategic alignment, especially when early-stage revenue is tight.  

There is also a recurring mismatch in expectations. Some franchisees enter believing the business will largely run itself, like a passive source of income. In practice, they are signing on to operate a business that requires daily involvement, staffing oversight, and constant performance management. I have seen situations where franchisees appear to have become interested simply because they liked the product – they were customers, not business operators. When the reality of ownership sets in, that initial enthusiasm quickly turns to frustration. 

This disconnect, between what the franchisee expects and what the business demands, is one of the most common sources of early strain in franchise relationships.  It often leads to compliance issues, terminations, and reputational damage across the system. 

The consequences of growing without infrastructure  

Even with a solid concept and capable franchisees, a franchise system will falter if it lacks scalable infrastructure.  In many cases, franchisors expand too early – before the operational foundation has been properly built out. They begin adding locations without first establishing the necessary systems, processes, and team capacity to support them. 

Franchisees in these systems often receive limited training, unclear operational manuals, and inconsistent communication. Without structured guidance, local operators begin to diverge from the intended model, leading to performance gaps and brand dilution. At the same time, the franchisor’s internal team becomes overwhelmed – unable to meet the demands of a growing network, let alone resolve problems as they arise. 

Once operational inconsistencies take root, regaining control becomes difficult. Franchisee trust begins to erode, and the brand starts showing signs of instability from within. 

Financial assumptions that weaken the system 

A common misconception in franchising is that profitability will come quickly. In reality, many systems do not begin to achieve sustainable profitability until they reach a scale of 30 to 50 operating units – the point at which royalty revenues can start to cover head office and system support costs. Getting to that threshold takes time, discipline, and significant capital. Yet many franchisors underestimate the financial runway required, leaving the system exposed well before it becomes viable. 

Compounding the issue is the failure to evolve. Concepts that do not adapt, whether in branding, technology, or customer experience, risk falling behind in industries that move quickly. What resonated with consumers at launch may not hold up in a competitive and changing marketplace. 

Put together, these financial miscalculations, such as short funding horizons and stagnating brand relevance, result is a system that struggles to sustain growth or attract the right franchisees.  It becomes increasingly vulnerable to disruption. 

The collapse trigger: a non-compliant FDD 

While business challenges can often be addressed over time, a non-compliant FDD is different. It exposes the franchisor to immediate and substantial legal liability. 

In Ontario, BC, Alberta and several other provinces, the FDD is not just a best practice –  it is a statutory requirement. It must provide clear, accurate, and complete information to prospective franchisees. Omissions or inaccuracies, even if unintentional, can result in rescission claims. The consequences can be severe.  

The legal and financial impact of FDD non-compliance 

Franchisees who succeed in a rescission claim are typically entitled to: 

• full reimbursement of all fees, royalties, and other franchise payments; 
• repayment for equipment, leasehold improvements, and inventory, and 
• compensation for operating losses and unpaid wages 

In practical terms, a single rescission claim in the quick-service sector can exceed $400,000 to $600,000. A handful of claims can push liabilities into the millions, which is far beyond what most emerging franchisors can absorb financially.   

When the system starts to unravel 

Once one claim is successful, others often follow. It is rarely a one-off.  The litigation pressure, settlement costs, and reputational damage tied to rescission claims can paralyze a franchisor. These are rarely isolated.  They tend to arrive in waves, particularly when franchisees coordinate their rescission claims. 

Some franchise systems may have been able to recover from earlier missteps. But once rescission claims begin, survival becomes far less certain. 

Staying ahead of the risk 

FDD compliance is not just a legal formality.  Rather, it is a critical element of system-wide risk management. Doing it right means working with professionals who understand both the legal framework and the practical realities of franchising. This includes engaging a franchise lawyer with experience in regulatory compliance and franchise operations. 

 It also means treating the FDD as a living document. It must be reviewed and updated regularly – for each franchise sale as well as after any material change in the business, whether in fees, financial structure, or operational practices. Failing to keep it current and specific to the franchise location opens the door to avoidable legal exposure. 

When the system fails – and how to prevent it 

Franchisor failure is rarely caused by a single misstep. It is usually the result of a pattern – a weak concept, poorly aligned franchisees, limited infrastructure, and flawed financial assumptions. But in many of the worst failures I have seen, the turning point is a rescission claim arising from an inadequate FDD. 

This is where franchisors and the lawyers and advisors guiding them must stay proactive. A viable system needs more than ambition: it requires a scalable concept, franchisees aligned for the long term, operational readiness, and a properly maintained FDD. 

At that point, the question is no longer whether the FDD meets formal requirements. It is whether the franchise system has the structure, financial resilience, and legal foresight to withstand the pressure of disputes, manage growing operational demands, and avoid being derailed by preventable legal and business risks.

Further reading:   

• Four steps to mitigate rescission risk
• Reducing the risk of rescission claims: Key information to give to your franchise lawyer

Law Works offers complimentary initial 15-20 min telephone consultations, which you can book online.

The information contained in this article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should not act on this information without seeking professional legal advice from a lawyer experienced in this area. The content in this article may not reflect the most current legal developments, and the application of law can vary in different provinces and territories. As such, the information in this article is not guaranteed to be complete, correct, or up to date. The author and the publisher of this article disclaim all liability for any actions taken or not taken based on any or all of the contents of this site.  

The Law Works website offers a vast number of resources by way of blog articles, courses and webinars about franchise, commercial and real estate disputes. Subscribe to our newsletters to stay up to date on the latest information from us.